DNC Led in Prayer for Global Conversion to Islam: Ignorance of Islamic Terminology Rampant in Washington

On Saturday, World Net Daily reported that at Friday’s Democratic National Committee (DNC) winter meeting, attendees bowed their heads and were led in prayer by a popular Michigan religious leader. The party usually associated with ACLU positions on prayer religion’s role in public life, appeared in its winter meeting to be eager to show its reverence for religious practice. On the surface this would appear to be a welcome change for the DNC, but when it comes to the DNC and its quest to cast itself as mainstream America, nothing is as it seems. As the DNC bowed and listened to a prayer seemingly for peace, brotherhood, and an end to global strife, what was actually prayed for by the religious leader went completely unrecognized and unchallenged by DNC members.

In a remarkable, but sadly not uncommon (Rep. Silvestre Reyes, Chairman House Intelligence Committee unaware of whether Al Qaeda was Sunni or Shiite), display of Washington’s chronic cultural ignorance of Islamic culture and symbolism, DNC members prayed for their own conversion to Islam, liberation of the world from religions other than Islam, the end of American and Israeli “occupations” in the Middle East, and the destruction of Israel. More troubling is that none of them appear to have realized they had done so.

The meaning of the prayer, spoken in English by Husham Al-Husainy, Shiite imam of the Karbalaa Islamic Education Center, a mosque in Dearborn, Michigan, was clearly understood by those with knowledge of Islamic symbolism, but not by any DNC members, many of whom already hold or aspire to occupy the most sensitive policy making positions within the US Government. Senators, Congressman, presidential aspirants, and key staffers, the power-wielders in the party now controlling Congress suffer from a deplorable ignorance of traditional, let alone radical Islam. Lest Republicans gloat about their rival colleagues’ shortcomings, a similar ignorance of Islam exists in that party as well, though displayed less transparently than Rep. Reyes and the DNC have illustrated.

Robert Spencer, Director of Jihad Watch, reviewed a transcript of the prayer and provided a concise explanation of terms as they relate to Islamic culture, history, and teachings from the Quran. The prayer was delivered as follows:

“In the name of God the most merciful, the most compassionate. We thank you, God, to bless us among your creations. We thank you, God, to make us as a great nation. We thank you God, to send us your messages through our father Abraham and Moses and Jesus and Muhammad. Through you, God, we unite. So guide us to the right path. The path of the people you bless, not the path of the people you doom. Help us God to liberate and fill this earth with justice and peace and love and equality. And help us to stop the war and violence, and oppression and occupation. Ameen.”

Spencer pointed out that in Islam, the term “straight path” refers to Islamic Sharia, the body of Islamic law that governs politics, economics, behaviors and all other aspects of life under Islamic rule. All other paths, or governmental forms, are errant and must be corrected. Likewise, the phrase “the path of the people you bless” refers to peoples living under Sharia law. All other religions or nations not under Sharia rule are doomed.

It is significant that the next sentence importunes God to “liberate and fill the earth with justice”. Liberate whom, and what form would justice take? “Liberation” in Islamic terminology denotes conversion of all nations to Islam, or liberation from errant religions, and “justice” equates to Sharia, the Islamic code of laws Muslims would implement after “liberating” nations oppressed by other religions, such as Judaism and Christianity.

Imam Al-Husainy concluded with the obligatory reference to Israel, calling for an end to the Israeli state and its presence on (occupation of) disputed Arab land, as well as and end to the US “occupation” of Iraq. To embrace a prayer with such references and wishes is ironically stunning for the DNC, which is supported with fierce (though clearly misguided) loyalty by American Jews. Donating to campaigns of candidates from a party that invites clerics to pray for global conversion to Islam is, one would reasonably conclude, not in the interest of members of any other religion or no religion at all. Under Sharia there is no special consideration or immunity granted to atheists, agnostics, or naturalists. ACLU secular crusaders would face beheading for attempting to separate Church and State under Sharia law.

That the DNC sought to demonstrate its conveniently new effort to appear religious by inviting an imam to pray is not objectionable. That the DNC did not recognize or have courage to criticize the content of the prayer should stir outrage among all Americans of either party and of all religions. Our elected officials and the parties funding them either lack basic knowledge of Islamic culture and the teachings of the Quran, or if they have such awareness lack the fortitude to point out and condemn thinly veiled calls for the overthrow of America and Israel, especially when those calls come from a popular imam.

Secretary of State Rice recently bowed to “political correctness”, referring to HAMAS as a “resistance movement” rather than a terrorist group (despite the State Department’s official designation of HAMAS as a terrorist organization). Even those tasked with recruiting allies in the War on Terror are afraid of offending terrorists by calling them terrorists. It should come as no surprise that the DNC imam had the audacity to pray for such things by invitation in front of a prominent political organization. That he did so and no one in Washington noticed or cared should be a clear warning sign to all who are not on the “straight path” that radical Islam is winning the political, media, and culture war here while our soldiers are fighting the physical war in the Middle East.


Technorati Search Tags: DNC Husham Al-Husainy World Net Daily Robert Spencer Jihad Watch Islamic Conversion HAMAS Dearborn US Department of State Condoleeza Rice Global War On Terror Silvestre Reyes Israeli Occupation

Being On The Christian End of Persecution: A Response to Megan Basham's Townhall Column

Townhall.com columnist Megan Basham wrote yesterday that she is finding it difficult to be as indignant about this year’s ACLU war on Christmas because compared to violence faced by Christians worldwide, specifically in India, the ACLU’s efforts are “more like a nuisance than persecution.” Basham’s column is eloquent and makes many astute observations. Clearly she wrote it with the best of intentions, notably to draw attention to the plight of Christians in India who are driven from their homes and churches, tortured, and even killed for their beliefs when they refuse to convert to the dominant faith of their country. She cited numerous horrific examples of violence and persecution against Christians in India as documented by Gospel for Asia (GFA), and then offered the following thought-provoking personal statement:

Of course, I am annoyed when I hear that liberal atheists are once again protesting a courthouse crèche—but I likely would be more annoyed to be on the Christian end of any of the above incidents.

Certainly no sane person hopes to be driven from home, stoned, mutilated, burned alive, or to suffer any of the horrific assaults described in Basham’s column. Yet Basham’s application of persecutory relativism does a disservice to both the suffering Christians she clearly hopes to help and to American Christians fighting tenaciously to preserve the right to say “Merry Christmas.”

While Basham clearly asserts she would not want to “be on the Christian end” of any of the violent incidents described in her column, the reality for Christians historically is that suffering persecution and even death has always been a possible result for being true to the faith. Martyrs are revered and in some denominations granted saint status for making the ultimate sacrifice for the cause of Christianity. Why? The reason quite simply is that being threatened with death is a true refiner’s fire, the most severe test of faith a Christian can face. Choosing to suffer death rather than deny the faith or submit to forced conversion demonstrates the depth and sincerity of a Christian’s love for and belief in Christ. To deny one’s faith, or even temporarily to depart from it, can cause suffering and pain more soul-wrenching than physical death.

To be “on the Christian end” of violent persecution, though physically painful, can polish character and soul in ways no other test can duplicate. Likewise, witnessing suffering can prick consciences in ways no other method can approach. The images of the 1961 Freedom Riders facing mobs, beatings, and frightening intimidation, and similar images of civil rights marchers being assaulted by dogs and fire hoses stir feelings of outrage tempered by admiration for those who suffered for a greater cause. Though a different way might have been less painful, those who suffered considered it an honor to stand firm in the face of persecution.

In many ways, India’s persecuted Christians are in a better position than their American counterparts. As Basham rightly notes, India’s Christians have been relegated to the poor classes of society, precisely the class of people who best received the Jesus’s teachings in Jerusalem. Among the poor are often found the most humble and receptive elements of society. American Christians have long suffered from an excess of material wealth, and such prosperity breeds apathy toward religion, or if not apathy, only partial observance of Christian values. How else does one explain the American Christian abandonment of the commandment to keep the Sabbath Day holy? How do shopping, dining out, boating, youth sports leagues, and attending sporting events honor the Sabbath? Notably, all these activities require prosperity. This willingness to obey only those religious tenets that are convenient pales in comparison to the courageous Christianity exemplified by those Basham describes. Although they may suffer for it, India’s Christians are certainly living closer to the Christian ideal than America’s Christians. Perhaps diligently living one’s faith is a greater challenge than dying for it.

As the ACLU subtly undermines religious faith by taking small but persistent steps toward eliminating religious expression from public life, more and more American Christians do what Megan Basham, albeit inadvertently, did: look at extreme examples of persecution around the world and succumb to the whisperings of relativism. To declare that since the ACLU is not killing Christians its activities are a mere nuisance underestimates the eroding effect the secular war on Christianity is having in America.

In India the Christians are persecuted because they continue to meet together to worship, facing assaults and death in their desire to practice their religion. American Christians cower in the corner when the dreaded word “lawsuit” comes from the lips of an ACLU attorney. India’s Christians are assaulted for teaching from the bible in their schools. American Christians stop teaching that Christianity was important in the founding of the nation and no longer offer prayers at schools and public events because they are intimidated by lawyers. India’s Christians are removed from their homes rather than deny their new faith. American Christians meekly turn the other cheek when city councils vote to remove crosses, crèches, and the Ten Commandments from public view. Who then is better off, one who suffers for Christianity’s sake, or one who avoids the suffering by shrinking from his/her Christianity?

Basham, in making an admirable plea to readers to support and pray for India’s Christians, concludes, “The day may come where the ACLU has its way and our faith is officially declared an affront to the state, but that day has not yet arrived.” Unfortunately, that day is closer than Basham may realize.

ACLU assaults on Christianity in America, though different in form, are no less insidious or fearsome than those faced by India’s Christians. The physical persecutions faced in India bring focus and a dependence on Divine assistance to face those trials with courage in the face of death. The legal and social persecutions faced in America should generate the same determination not to deny the faith or be intimidated by legions of lawsuit-wielding lawyers.

ACLU Townhall GFA India Christianity Megan Basham religious persecution war on Christmas